<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Statement on the TwitBlock backlash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/</link>
	<description>Tim Whitlock&#039;s personal site and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrisonma1</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrisonma1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Great job - this is an extremely useful tool in removing spammers.  Spammers ruin it for everyone.  I carefully review each identified &#039;spammer&#039; before I block them.  I agree with ceejayoz that your complainers are likely &#039;affliliate marketers&#039;.

Keep up the great work!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job &#8211; this is an extremely useful tool in removing spammers.  Spammers ruin it for everyone.  I carefully review each identified &#8216;spammer&#8217; before I block them.  I agree with ceejayoz that your complainers are likely &#8216;affliliate marketers&#8217;.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceejayoz</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>ceejayoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Funny how many of those complaining have something like &quot;affiliate marketer&quot; in their profiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how many of those complaining have something like &#8220;affiliate marketer&#8221; in their profiles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>@kesasar Bang on!
Reciprocal blocking is a myth... (unless another app out there provides it)
TwitBlock could reveal who is blocking you if you are both TwitBlock users - but we WILL NOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kesasar Bang on!<br />
Reciprocal blocking is a myth&#8230; (unless another app out there provides it)<br />
TwitBlock could reveal who is blocking you if you are both TwitBlock users &#8211; but we WILL NOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kesasar</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>kesasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Tim thanks a lot for your website
We all know that the magic formula to detect a spammer doesn&#039;t exist
Please all remember how email spam filters works ...

Blocked Spammer won&#039;t block you in return :
- they don&#039;t care
- they are are bots !
- you can&#039;t see who&#039;s blocking you ...block in peace my friends !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim thanks a lot for your website<br />
We all know that the magic formula to detect a spammer doesn&#8217;t exist<br />
Please all remember how email spam filters works &#8230;</p>
<p>Blocked Spammer won&#8217;t block you in return :<br />
- they don&#8217;t care<br />
- they are are bots !<br />
- you can&#8217;t see who&#8217;s blocking you &#8230;block in peace my friends !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iRobt</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>iRobt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Keep up the good work Tim.  The only suggestion I have is to make the whitelisted sites equally ranked with the blocked/blacklisted and give both lower rank in the algorithm.

That&#039;s the biggest source of false hit&#039;s I&#039;ve noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good work Tim.  The only suggestion I have is to make the whitelisted sites equally ranked with the blocked/blacklisted and give both lower rank in the algorithm.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the biggest source of false hit&#8217;s I&#8217;ve noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Many thanks to the supporters,

To those against the service: I am listening and you are making some valid points. You are just making them in a non-constructive way.

To whoever reported my IP addresses as spam: don&#039;t assume this helps the situation. This makes me much more likely to take a hard line with the service. I am currently trying to please everyone.

Seeing spam scores out of context is the primary problem. They are of use when in context, i.e. seen relatively with the spammiest people brought to the surface for you to investigate.

I will be working on this problem immediately, stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks to the supporters,</p>
<p>To those against the service: I am listening and you are making some valid points. You are just making them in a non-constructive way.</p>
<p>To whoever reported my IP addresses as spam: don&#8217;t assume this helps the situation. This makes me much more likely to take a hard line with the service. I am currently trying to please everyone.</p>
<p>Seeing spam scores out of context is the primary problem. They are of use when in context, i.e. seen relatively with the spammiest people brought to the surface for you to investigate.</p>
<p>I will be working on this problem immediately, stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binny</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Binny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>TwitBlock is great, don&#039;t listen to anyone who tells you its not!

I found you this week by accident, was looking for a way to get rid of those pesky spammers. I have always block the ones I think are spam, not just to protect me, but to stop anyone else following me from seeing them and even thinking about having a look.

You clearly say the software is Alpha, and all blocking software requires some common sense. There are a number of accounts that I know are not spam but have high scores.. at least I can see the potential ones and get rid of the real ones.

Spam is a problem for Twitter, and I think its only going to get worse. Spam blocking will become an important part of Twitter like it is in e-mail, and blog comments. Your service will only get better, and I look forward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TwitBlock is great, don&#8217;t listen to anyone who tells you its not!</p>
<p>I found you this week by accident, was looking for a way to get rid of those pesky spammers. I have always block the ones I think are spam, not just to protect me, but to stop anyone else following me from seeing them and even thinking about having a look.</p>
<p>You clearly say the software is Alpha, and all blocking software requires some common sense. There are a number of accounts that I know are not spam but have high scores.. at least I can see the potential ones and get rid of the real ones.</p>
<p>Spam is a problem for Twitter, and I think its only going to get worse. Spam blocking will become an important part of Twitter like it is in e-mail, and blog comments. Your service will only get better, and I look forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt King</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I always systematically blocked &quot;dodgy&quot; followers before TwitBlock existed, so having an this app to do it really has made no difference to me other than make it easier for me to manage this process plus also help build up a picture of spam behaviour.

I have never come across reciprocal blocking. I currently block around 20-odd accounts and none have returned the favour. This is probably down to the fact that I carefully select them based on a common-sense approach so the only ones I ever block are 100% spam. I doubt if these spambots have feelings or egos so no love lost

When I run TwitBlock I get at least 4-5 accounts that score very high (in the hundreds) that I know aren’t spam (but some people may view as a nuisance, causing a high score based on block count). I personally leave these unblocked due to the fact that TwitBlock simply indicates the likelihood of the account being spam.

I will continue to use TwitBlock as a handy tool for bulk-managing the increasing amount of spambot accounts that follow me on Twitter. As David mentioned above - TwitBlock requires user common-sense to operate correctly. However as this can’t be guaranteed, maybe one solution is to apply less weight/points to the block count.

Nice one Tim on the creation of TwitBlock. I understand that you’ve had this plunged rapidly into the limelight so I assume, currently, most of the pointing system was based on calcualted guess work. The only way is up. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always systematically blocked &#8220;dodgy&#8221; followers before TwitBlock existed, so having an this app to do it really has made no difference to me other than make it easier for me to manage this process plus also help build up a picture of spam behaviour.</p>
<p>I have never come across reciprocal blocking. I currently block around 20-odd accounts and none have returned the favour. This is probably down to the fact that I carefully select them based on a common-sense approach so the only ones I ever block are 100% spam. I doubt if these spambots have feelings or egos so no love lost</p>
<p>When I run TwitBlock I get at least 4-5 accounts that score very high (in the hundreds) that I know aren’t spam (but some people may view as a nuisance, causing a high score based on block count). I personally leave these unblocked due to the fact that TwitBlock simply indicates the likelihood of the account being spam.</p>
<p>I will continue to use TwitBlock as a handy tool for bulk-managing the increasing amount of spambot accounts that follow me on Twitter. As David mentioned above &#8211; TwitBlock requires user common-sense to operate correctly. However as this can’t be guaranteed, maybe one solution is to apply less weight/points to the block count.</p>
<p>Nice one Tim on the creation of TwitBlock. I understand that you’ve had this plunged rapidly into the limelight so I assume, currently, most of the pointing system was based on calcualted guess work. The only way is up. <img src='http://timwhitlock.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Roelands</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Roelands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Tim,

Your site causes damage to no one.  Your site provides -information- to Twitter users, and they use that information to make decisions.

Twitblock helps users to improve their Twitter experience.  Keep up the excellent work, and if there&#039;s any way I can help you with Twitblock, please let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>Your site causes damage to no one.  Your site provides -information- to Twitter users, and they use that information to make decisions.</p>
<p>Twitblock helps users to improve their Twitter experience.  Keep up the excellent work, and if there&#8217;s any way I can help you with Twitblock, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naesk</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>naesk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/22/statement-on-the-twitblock-backlash/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Seems the Tweeps who are complaining don&#039;t really understand TwitBlock service, nor the affects of spam proliferation ranging from pure annoyance to a individual user, to the resources &amp; time required to fight it, which ultimately places strain to the quality of service.

I wonder if those complaining have the auto follow function turned on, or use mutual-follow &amp; similar services for kudos/inflating ego purposes, more importantly do they contribute by reporting spam they receive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems the Tweeps who are complaining don&#8217;t really understand TwitBlock service, nor the affects of spam proliferation ranging from pure annoyance to a individual user, to the resources &amp; time required to fight it, which ultimately places strain to the quality of service.</p>
<p>I wonder if those complaining have the auto follow function turned on, or use mutual-follow &amp; similar services for kudos/inflating ego purposes, more importantly do they contribute by reporting spam they receive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

