<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open letter #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/</link>
	<description>Tim Whitlock&#039;s personal site and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheJackalsMARK</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>TheJackalsMARK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Also, to ocdgirl2000 You GO GIRL! I Couldn&#039;t Have Said It Any BETTER! &amp; TO &quot;It&#039;s Me&quot;, Follow ME &amp; See where That Spammin SH*T ends UP! &amp; how MANY of MY humble 500 do EXACTLY the SAME! You R TheJackal&#039;s &quot;MARK&quot;! TJN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, to ocdgirl2000 You GO GIRL! I Couldn&#8217;t Have Said It Any BETTER! &amp; TO &#8220;It&#8217;s Me&#8221;, Follow ME &amp; See where That Spammin SH*T ends UP! &amp; how MANY of MY humble 500 do EXACTLY the SAME! You R TheJackal&#8217;s &#8220;MARK&#8221;! TJN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheJackalsMARK</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>TheJackalsMARK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>I, as do MANY round the WORLD, fight SPAMMERS &amp; the GARBAGE they pollute our Soc Med with! Your doin a GREAT JOB! You DO tell ppl that the report is only an INDICATOR of POSSIBLE spam &amp; PHYSICALLY check the SUSPECTED profiles THEMSELVES B4 BLOCKING! - TJM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, as do MANY round the WORLD, fight SPAMMERS &amp; the GARBAGE they pollute our Soc Med with! Your doin a GREAT JOB! You DO tell ppl that the report is only an INDICATOR of POSSIBLE spam &amp; PHYSICALLY check the SUSPECTED profiles THEMSELVES B4 BLOCKING! &#8211; TJM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocdgirl2000</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>ocdgirl2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s Me&quot;
Twitter is a FREE service. You are NOT paying for this service so YOU are not entitled to ANY special privileges. Where do YOU get off complaining about a service that people want to use to preserve their PEACE?

Personally, I do NOT want to be on anyone&#039;s FOLLOW list who has millions of people on it. Especially not marketing affiliates, GURUS, businessmen, &quot;experts&quot; or anyone else promoting themselves at MY expense. So if I find ME on YOUR follow list, you bet your bottom dollar I&#039;ll block you, using Tim&#039;s Program or my own little finger on the Twitter Block button. You don&#039;t need to Complain about Tim&#039;s program. All he did was make it a little easier for those of us who have old computers..you know, the ones with Windows ME 2000, who have to take way too much time playing around going from page to page wasting time looking at sites like yours.

I&#039;m a Nurse, and have a small business too. I&#039;ve blocked 833 followers. I have only 600+ followers, that&#039;s fine. It&#039;s QUALITY I care about, not quantity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s Me&#8221;<br />
Twitter is a FREE service. You are NOT paying for this service so YOU are not entitled to ANY special privileges. Where do YOU get off complaining about a service that people want to use to preserve their PEACE?</p>
<p>Personally, I do NOT want to be on anyone&#8217;s FOLLOW list who has millions of people on it. Especially not marketing affiliates, GURUS, businessmen, &#8220;experts&#8221; or anyone else promoting themselves at MY expense. So if I find ME on YOUR follow list, you bet your bottom dollar I&#8217;ll block you, using Tim&#8217;s Program or my own little finger on the Twitter Block button. You don&#8217;t need to Complain about Tim&#8217;s program. All he did was make it a little easier for those of us who have old computers..you know, the ones with Windows ME 2000, who have to take way too much time playing around going from page to page wasting time looking at sites like yours.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Nurse, and have a small business too. I&#8217;ve blocked 833 followers. I have only 600+ followers, that&#8217;s fine. It&#8217;s QUALITY I care about, not quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Hunt</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 01:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>This spammer deserves a slapped across the face for losing sleep over Twitter. I think he should even lose more than sleep, his account should be blocked too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This spammer deserves a slapped across the face for losing sleep over Twitter. I think he should even lose more than sleep, his account should be blocked too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug C.</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I agree with Julie - people like that need to get a real life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Julie &#8211; people like that need to get a real life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Roelands</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Roelands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Twitblock doesn&#039;t block users: users do.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is misinformed, a spammer or (probably) both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitblock doesn&#8217;t block users: users do.</p>
<p>Anyone who thinks otherwise is misinformed, a spammer or (probably) both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I amended this post because I suddenly just realised today .. the &quot;rapid pace&quot; of blocks increasing was actually the rapid pace of people joining TwitBlock and sharing the blocks they had already made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I amended this post because I suddenly just realised today .. the &#8220;rapid pace&#8221; of blocks increasing was actually the rapid pace of people joining TwitBlock and sharing the blocks they had already made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's me</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>It's me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Be honest Tim - you need to also point out that person who you unethically violated their trust by posting this email without permission......

does not post links to his sites in their tweets but does list the 2 sites you mention in his profile, he doesn&#039;t spam, he doesn&#039;t use auto-DMs, he builds relationships, he also promotes his Twitter account off-site, he has volunteered for his community in times of trouble, he helps other Twitter users with their questions &amp; problems via email-Twitter-DM &amp; phone, treats all with respect, etc.... also according to your stats follows 474 people a day &amp; 5 of these people per day don&#039;t follow back. You talk about protecting this persons privacy yet shortly later in comments you provide information exposing him? (sigh....)

Yes - this person is an affiliate marketer &amp; entrepreneur but he also properly uses Twitter by not spamming his links. His sites sell weight loss products, clothing, etc.... which is absolutely &quot;OK&quot;. Your words suggest prejudice to all entrepreneurs/affiliate marketers.

I don&#039;t like spammers on Twitter just as much as everyone else but to misclassify regular entrepreneurs/popular users as spammers/nuisances as your site &quot;initially&quot; did caused false blocks by many people.... that is an absolute fact. Everyone has different reasons to use Twitter &amp; people shouldn&#039;t have vehement anger to those who have amassed many followers for various reasons. I admit that I enjoy having many followers &amp; I also understand the reasons of those who choose not to have many followers. The key is to repect each others choices/opinions &amp; try not to attack different points of view.

In case everyone hasn&#039;t figured out - that person is me. I stood up for what I saw was injustice of many great Twitterers being labeled as spammers &amp; nuisances and having their accounts falsely blocked at a rapid pace. Recent site changes have stopped that effect (Hooray!). I don&#039;t regret my stance because I know it was right. I have been kind to you Tim &amp; have been honest in my thoughts. I would like to think that my words have made a difference improving your site. I am however very saddened to see my private email to you published.

Twitter isn&#039;t a game to me - it is the social media platform I have chosen to hopefully excel in. I don&#039;t want to see that torn apart. I wish you &amp; all Twitter users the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be honest Tim &#8211; you need to also point out that person who you unethically violated their trust by posting this email without permission&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>does not post links to his sites in their tweets but does list the 2 sites you mention in his profile, he doesn&#8217;t spam, he doesn&#8217;t use auto-DMs, he builds relationships, he also promotes his Twitter account off-site, he has volunteered for his community in times of trouble, he helps other Twitter users with their questions &amp; problems via email-Twitter-DM &amp; phone, treats all with respect, etc&#8230;. also according to your stats follows 474 people a day &amp; 5 of these people per day don&#8217;t follow back. You talk about protecting this persons privacy yet shortly later in comments you provide information exposing him? (sigh&#8230;.)</p>
<p>Yes &#8211; this person is an affiliate marketer &amp; entrepreneur but he also properly uses Twitter by not spamming his links. His sites sell weight loss products, clothing, etc&#8230;. which is absolutely &#8220;OK&#8221;. Your words suggest prejudice to all entrepreneurs/affiliate marketers.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like spammers on Twitter just as much as everyone else but to misclassify regular entrepreneurs/popular users as spammers/nuisances as your site &#8220;initially&#8221; did caused false blocks by many people&#8230;. that is an absolute fact. Everyone has different reasons to use Twitter &amp; people shouldn&#8217;t have vehement anger to those who have amassed many followers for various reasons. I admit that I enjoy having many followers &amp; I also understand the reasons of those who choose not to have many followers. The key is to repect each others choices/opinions &amp; try not to attack different points of view.</p>
<p>In case everyone hasn&#8217;t figured out &#8211; that person is me. I stood up for what I saw was injustice of many great Twitterers being labeled as spammers &amp; nuisances and having their accounts falsely blocked at a rapid pace. Recent site changes have stopped that effect (Hooray!). I don&#8217;t regret my stance because I know it was right. I have been kind to you Tim &amp; have been honest in my thoughts. I would like to think that my words have made a difference improving your site. I am however very saddened to see my private email to you published.</p>
<p>Twitter isn&#8217;t a game to me &#8211; it is the social media platform I have chosen to hopefully excel in. I don&#8217;t want to see that torn apart. I wish you &amp; all Twitter users the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Chapman</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>85,000 followers on a junk twitter account? That&#039;s a whole lotta bots. He should use TwitBlock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>85,000 followers on a junk twitter account? That&#8217;s a whole lotta bots. He should use TwitBlock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/08/23/open-letter-1/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Quite right Matt.
And I&#039;d like to point out that my softening of the scoring system was to protect popular users where high follow rates are a result of &quot;following back&quot;, and also to protect people who are blocked out of animosity, or for political and religious views. I wasn&#039;t trying to protect affiliate marketing &quot;entrepreneurs&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite right Matt.<br />
And I&#8217;d like to point out that my softening of the scoring system was to protect popular users where high follow rates are a result of &#8220;following back&#8221;, and also to protect people who are blocked out of animosity, or for political and religious views. I wasn&#8217;t trying to protect affiliate marketing &#8220;entrepreneurs&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

