<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>timwhitlock.info &#187; blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timwhitlock.info/blog/tag/blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timwhitlock.info</link>
	<description>Tim Whitlock&#039;s personal site and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I am eating a sandwich</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/01/11/i-am-eating-a-sandwich/</link>
		<comments>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/01/11/i-am-eating-a-sandwich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2009/01/11/i-am-eating-a-sandwich/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been forcing myself to Twitter this week. That&#8217;s Twitter as verb and a proper noun of course. I say force, because frankly the first time I tried it I didn&#8217;t really see the point. But I figured 3 million people can&#8217;t be wrong, so I&#8217;ve agreed to not only give it some more time, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I&#8217;ve been forcing myself to <a href="http://twitter.com/timwhitlock" target="_blank">Twitter</a> this week.</strong> That&#8217;s Twitter as verb and a proper noun of course. I say <em>force</em>, because frankly the first time I tried it I didn&#8217;t really see the point. But I figured 3 million people can&#8217;t be wrong, so I&#8217;ve agreed to not only give it some more time, but try and use it <em>properly</em>. Yes, that&#8217;s right I was clearly using it wrongly &#8211; at least that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m told by more avid <em>twits</em> than myself, and actually it&#8217;s this that interests me most &#8211; the idea that you can use a site wrongly.<span id="more-83"></span></p>
<p>I think the main reason I didn&#8217;t see the point at first is that it was too easy to draw a direct comparison to the larger, more popular social playgrounds &#8211; Facebook et al. It stands to reason that a rather late new-comer like myself would look to these larger sites as a way of understanding what Twitter is and why they might want to use it, or whether they need to use it to be a valid member of the human race. At first glance the obvious conclusion is that it&#8217;s &#8211; &#8220;<em>a bit like Facebook but with just the status, and that&#8217;s it? what&#8217;s the point in that?</em>&#8221; &#8211; I am quoting an imaginary person here you see. This person is called John; he gets annoyed by knowing what his friends are having for lunch, but he&#8217;s got a Facebook account anyway because he&#8217;d hate to miss out, so he just grumbles about it.</p>
<h4>Nano blog?</h4>
<p>The &#8220;status update&#8221; is ultimately a dumbed-down incarnation of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro-blogging" target="_blank">micro blog</a>; a nano blog perhaps? It seems practically every website that you log onto offers you a way to express yourself and validate your presence in some trivial fashion. This dumbing down is much less prevalent on Twitter, which I am now starting to see as its raison d&#8217;etre. I was most amused to compare <a href="http://twitter.com/andywhitlock">my brother&#8217;s tweets</a> to his Facebook status updates. The latter being somewhat inane, humorous references for the <em>masses</em>, and the former being much more considered prose; invariably eloquent and clearly aimed a more selective, professional readership. Not just a man who knows his audience, I thought, but proof if proof be needed that Twitter is much more of a cult than Facebook, and (dare I say?) an occasionally pretentious one at that (yes, I dared). I made the heinous error of adding the Facebook Twitter application which set my Facebook status with each Tweet. I am ashamed that the Twitter audience had to suffer my vacuous existence during that period. (hangs head).</p>
<p>So what would happen if Twitter reached a tipping point like Facebook did a couple of years ago? If people start joining because they find their friends are communicating in some kind of secret club and they don&#8217;t want to miss out. Let&#8217;s face it (no pun intended) this was the impetus for a reluctant many that followed a geeky few. Of course I can&#8217;t validate that statement with any kind of fact, but I&#8217;m sure you too have witnessed the annoyance of the <em>non-facebooker</em>. <em>&#8220;Oh, sorry I didn&#8217;t email you about the party; I forgot you weren&#8217;t on Facebook&#8221;</em>. &#8211; That was Caroline; she likes tagging people but not herself; well, only if it&#8217;s a good photo.</p>
<p>Despite seeing a fair amount of Twitter in the popular press recently, I am somewhat sceptical that it will reach the dizzy heights of Facebook, at least not in it&#8217;s current form. Extending the platform would defeat its simplicity which is largely the point of it, but if it did become engulfed with 100 million users then I&#8217;m sure the community would naturally find ways to block out the sandwich-eating references and get more of the existential poetry they crave without offending their friends. People may just <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/09/how-many-twitter-accounts-do-you-have/" target="_blank">maintain multiple accounts</a>? A case for &#8220;channels&#8221; perhaps? serving the same purpose as groups on Facebook where you can choose to express yourself as you see fit in more fenced-off areas. Maybe we&#8217;d also find out for sure <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/01/twitter-said-to-be-abandoning-ruby-on-rails/" target="_blank">whether Ruby on Rails doesn&#8217;t scale</a>. Anyway, I think I&#8217;ve rambled enough &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/timwhitlock" target="_blank">tweet me</a>! Do you say that? is that the correct conjugation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2009/01/11/i-am-eating-a-sandwich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog 1</title>
		<link>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2008/03/15/blog-1-2/</link>
		<comments>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2008/03/15/blog-1-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/2008/03/16/blog-1-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to my humble corner of the Blogohedron! It is a common misconception that the blogging community is spherical, as it is also a misconception that the previous internet known as web 1 was destroyed in a fire in 2002. I am a web developer working largely within the creative industries in London, and surprisingly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to my humble corner of the <em>Blogohedron</em>!<br />
It is a common misconception that the blogging community is spherical, as it is also a misconception that the previous internet known as <em>web 1</em> was destroyed in a fire in 2002.<br />
<span id="more-6"></span></p>
<p>I am a web developer working largely within the creative industries in London, and surprisingly I am new to blogging. This is mostly due to the fact that I am a terrible writer, but also because I am generally rather busy code crunching in high-pressure agency type environments. When I do get a spare moment I have invariably got a vanity project on the go, which no doubt also consists of writing code.</p>
<p>So what shall I be blogging about? Well, It is most likely to be technical topics, but I hope to look around once in a while and discuss web technology issues in a more general context outside of my coding bubble. One thing is for certain, and that&#8217;s that I will use this blog for shameless self-promotion and generally showing off when I think I&#8217;ve done something cool.</p>
<p>More information about me, including my CV, is available at <a href="http://www.whiteinteractive.com/tim_whitlock/" title="White Interactive">whiteinteractive.com/tim_whitlock/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://timwhitlock.info/blog/2008/03/15/blog-1-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

